Research Studies & White Papers

SEO VS. PPC: EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS FOR ONLINE MEDICAL MARKETING

Many healthcare advertisers are aware of search engine marketing and the need to ‘optimize’ their rankings, but fewer are clear on the distinction between (nor the relative cost and power to generate actual referrals of) its two predominant marketing strategies; search engine optimization (SEO) and paid search (PPC) marketing. This empirical analysis explores SEO versus PPC for medical online marketers and presents a valid case to why overly focused SEO efforts yield 70% less actual patient inquiries than a blended campaign.

DOWNLOAD WHITEPAPER

SEO VS. PPC: EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS FOR ONLINE MEDICAL MARKETING

Many healthcare advertisers are aware of search engine marketing and the need to ‘optimize’ their rankings, but fewer are clear on the distinction between (nor the relative cost and power to generate actual referrals of) its two predominant marketing strategies; search engine optimization (SEO) and paid search (PPC) marketing. This empirical analysis explores SEO versus PPC for medical online marketers and presents a valid case to why overly focused SEO efforts yield 70% less actual patient inquiries than a blended campaign.

DOWNLOAD WHITEPAPER

SEO VS. PPC: EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS FOR ONLINE MEDICAL MARKETING

Many healthcare advertisers are aware of search engine marketing and the need to ‘optimize’ their rankings, but fewer are clear on the distinction between (nor the relative cost and power to generate actual referrals of) its two predominant marketing strategies; search engine optimization (SEO) and paid search (PPC) marketing. This empirical analysis explores SEO versus PPC for medical online marketers and presents a valid case to why overly focused SEO efforts yield 70% less actual patient inquiries than a blended campaign.

DOWNLOAD WHITEPAPER

Case Studies

SEO VS. PPC: EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS FOR ONLINE MEDICAL MARKETING

Many healthcare advertisers are aware of search engine marketing and the need to ‘optimize’ their rankings, but fewer are clear on the distinction between (nor the relative cost and power to generate actual referrals of) its two predominant marketing strategies; search engine optimization (SEO) and paid search (PPC) marketing. This empirical analysis explores SEO versus PPC for medical online marketers and presents a valid case to why overly focused SEO efforts yield 70% less actual patient inquiries than a blended campaign.

DOWNLOAD WHITEPAPER

SEO VS. PPC: EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS FOR ONLINE MEDICAL MARKETING

Many healthcare advertisers are aware of search engine marketing and the need to ‘optimize’ their rankings, but fewer are clear on the distinction between (nor the relative cost and power to generate actual referrals of) its two predominant marketing strategies; search engine optimization (SEO) and paid search (PPC) marketing. This empirical analysis explores SEO versus PPC for medical online marketers and presents a valid case to why overly focused SEO efforts yield 70% less actual patient inquiries than a blended campaign.

DOWNLOAD WHITEPAPER

SEO VS. PPC: EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS FOR ONLINE MEDICAL MARKETING

Many healthcare advertisers are aware of search engine marketing and the need to ‘optimize’ their rankings, but fewer are clear on the distinction between (nor the relative cost and power to generate actual referrals of) its two predominant marketing strategies; search engine optimization (SEO) and paid search (PPC) marketing. This empirical analysis explores SEO versus PPC for medical online marketers and presents a valid case to why overly focused SEO efforts yield 70% less actual patient inquiries than a blended campaign.

DOWNLOAD WHITEPAPER

SEO VS. PPC: EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS FOR ONLINE MEDICAL MARKETING

Many healthcare advertisers are aware of search engine marketing and the need to ‘optimize’ their rankings, but fewer are clear on the distinction between (nor the relative cost and power to generate actual referrals of) its two predominant marketing strategies; search engine optimization (SEO) and paid search (PPC) marketing. This empirical analysis explores SEO versus PPC for medical online marketers and presents a valid case to why overly focused SEO efforts yield 70% less actual patient inquiries than a blended campaign.

DOWNLOAD WHITEPAPER

SEO VS. PPC: EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS FOR ONLINE MEDICAL MARKETING

Many healthcare advertisers are aware of search engine marketing and the need to ‘optimize’ their rankings, but fewer are clear on the distinction between (nor the relative cost and power to generate actual referrals of) its two predominant marketing strategies; search engine optimization (SEO) and paid search (PPC) marketing. This empirical analysis explores SEO versus PPC for medical online marketers and presents a valid case to why overly focused SEO efforts yield 70% less actual patient inquiries than a blended campaign.

DOWNLOAD WHITEPAPER

SEO VS. PPC: EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS FOR ONLINE MEDICAL MARKETING

Many healthcare advertisers are aware of search engine marketing and the need to ‘optimize’ their rankings, but fewer are clear on the distinction between (nor the relative cost and power to generate actual referrals of) its two predominant marketing strategies; search engine optimization (SEO) and paid search (PPC) marketing. This empirical analysis explores SEO versus PPC for medical online marketers and presents a valid case to why overly focused SEO efforts yield 70% less actual patient inquiries than a blended campaign.

DOWNLOAD WHITEPAPER